Ecotourism Society Launched in 1990 to Assist Parks Part 2
This article is published as part of our special series Ecotourism Then and Now, commemorating the 20th anniversary of The International Ecotourism Society (TIES), through a joint effort by TIES and Megan Epler Wood, author of this article and founder of TIES.
Part 1 – Ecotourism 20 Years Ago
Part 2 – Ecotourism Now
Twenty years later in 2010, the funding crisis for protected areas remains. The hard work of getting funding mechanisms into place via government policies has advanced slowly.
Recent news is not encouraging. Parks and protected areas around the world face a growing crisis to cover the costs of their operation and management. It is estimated that at least $ 12-13 billion will be needed in the next decade to mange protected areas in developing countries according to IUCN World Congress documents in 2005. Parks have long been one of the main attractions for the tourism industry, and this trend continues to increase. But most decision makers remain woefully unaware of the economic importance of parks.
IUCN’s 2008 World Congress focused on creating market viable ecotourism products. In this exact same time period, the international adventure and related ecotourism industry was having one of its greatest boom periods in history. Businesses were bringing record numbers of visitors to parks, and yes entrance fees were being raised around the world. But few efforts to finance yawning budget gaps with tourism were implemented on the scale required. While park budgets reach crisis proportions, the tourism marketplace is kept at arm’s length by park administrators.
Nevertheless, real progress has been made. The national parks of South Africa launched a concession program that has been economically, socially, and environmentally successful, according to Gigu Varghese, the head of business development for South African National parks (SANParks) as reported in the book Responsible Tourism. SANParks manages over 4 million hectares of pristine wilderness in a system of 23 national parks. After the democratization of South Africa in 1994, the government became answerable to a much larger population and their economic needs.
In 1998, SANParks was told to prepare to become less dependent on government funding. In 2000, private operators were given the legal right to operate in 11 sites with 20-year contracts, a public-private approach known as concessions, which yielded over $14 million to SANParks in 5 years. Stringent environmental standards were applied and local employment was generated, all carefully monitored and scored to ensure that black populations were a prime beneficiary of the effort.
Concessions are a government contracting instrument with a solid history. The first concession arrangements for parks in the world were authorized by the US National Park Service after its founding in 1916. But only recently has it been fully demonstrated that this type of contract can also include environmental and social goals. According to IUCN author, Derek de La Harpe, in his chapter for the IUCN book Parks in Transition; park agencies, often with strong qualifications in biological issues, frequently lack the managerial, financial and commercial skills, resources and mindsets needed to oversee businesses. Most park agencies still resist working with the private sector.
Oliver Hillel, of the Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity, states, “The vast majority of national park agencies still are unprepared to partner productively with the tourism industry. Building the capacity of park agencies and local authorities to engage with tourism industry representatives could easily result in doubling current economic benefits from tourism to protected areas.”
Tourism concessions worth billions of dollars in new revenues for conservation could help to bridge the funding gap for parks around the world. Businesses are willing to pay governments for the opportunity to operate in parks and protected areas; and concession contracts that require strong environmental and social standards are entirely feasible.
The time has come to truly finance parks through tourism concessions. Hard work to create the legal mechanisms and management capacity is required, but the vision is clear. After 20 years, it appears that tourism is still the prime candidate to help pay for parks around the world.
More about the Author
Megan Epler Wood founded The International Ecotourism Society (TIES) in 1990, the oldest and largest non-profit organization in the world dedicated to making ecotourism a tool for sustainable tourism development worldwide. She was its President & CEO from 1991-2002. Since 2003, Megan’s firm EplerWood International has devoted itself to aiding some of the poorest countries in the world with sustainable tourism development, including the nations of Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Sierra Leone, Mexico, El Salvador, Brazil, and Honduras.
Her published works includes; Ecotourism: Principles, Practices and Policies for Sustainability for UNEP in 2002. She has lectured at Columbia Business School, Harvard University, Wellesley, Duke University, University of Vermont, and The George Washington University. She was named a Senior Fellow at the Institute at the Golden Gate in 2010 where she is developing next generation thinking on the development of tourism as a sustainable economic development tool in collaboration with leading universities, NGOs, and business professionals.










Back in 1991, I was Director of Southern Delaware Tourism and we brought Megan in to be a keynote speaker at our conference on ecotourism for the hospitality industry. Time flies when you’re having fun!
No disrespect to Megan’s enthusiasm, but actually that is not what Varghese said at all.
If you read his (diplomatically-written) chapter in Anna Spenceley’s book more carefully, you’ll see that the private concessions in Kruger NP actually haven’t worked nearly as well as was hoped.
One can learn the same in blunter language from the local tour operators. That model is not being duplicated elsewhere, which tells us a lot.
Meanwhile there is a much larger-scale experiment under way in the USA, where the Delaware North property corporation now operates visitors services at Yosemite National Park.
There are good reasons why parks management agencies hold tourism developers at arms length. If they don’t, history indicates that conservation comes off second best.
There are indeed private tourism corporations around the world which have contributed successfully to conservation and community development. But not many of them.
The bottom line for parks agencies is pretty much the same as for any long-term relationship: pick your private sector partners with extreme care.
Regards to all
Ralf Buckley
Dear Ralf,
Thanks for your comment! My firm had a reading group last summer which included an email interchange with Gigu Varghese. As a team, we dug into some of his concerns about oligarchical private businesses controlling much of the commerce. I see that diversity of competition has often been the root of the problem in concessioning. Getting compliance on social and environmental performance is key and more competition to win the right to manage tourism in PAs could help. I wrote a detailed paper since on Best Practice for Concessions in Latin America which will be published soon. The biggest issue in both case studies was the lack of diversity of ownership of the concessionaires. (These are policy reviews, not performance reviews to your point)
Here was one question formulated by our EWI team in follow up to the chapter and Varghese’s reply.
Our team:
What is being done about the lack of diversity in ownerships of the concessionaries? Has SanParks been able to address this and increase diversity of ownership?
Varghese answered:
Transformation, as the name implies is a process. After the initial contracts were awarded, the landscape of the ownership into the tourism sector in the country has changed. Large companies like Southern Sun, Tourvest, and the Don Group etc are having a majority black shareholding. This diversity of ethnicity in shareholding addresses Oligopolies to a small extent with some industry-thinking opening up. Tourism as a sector is also growing, and this implies that there is more competition – so slowly Oligopolies could reduce. Nature based African tourism is obviously limited to Africa and with the sizable part of that relatively small industry (in global terms) based in S Africa; it is difficult to address the oligopoly issues. India seems to be starting to develop good models one could learn from.
Hello,
I looking for ecotourism projects that have finished and moved away from the area. I am planning to do a rainforest research expedition in Latin America, yet still need precise locations.
I am trying to investigate what happens to the community and wildlife when ecotourist programmes terminate and move. What happens to people’s livelihoods and how is the wildlife impacted by this change?
So, if anyone can point me towards projects that had been established for 1 year or longer and concluded their mission, that would be absolutely amazing.
Thanks a lot for your help
Leave your response!
SUBSCRIBE TO YOUR TRAVEL CHOICE BLOG:
What Travelers Are Interested In
Categories
Recent Comments
Recent Posts
Most Commented
Most Viewed